Crothers Criminal Law specializes in DUI & Impaired Driving Charges in Mississauga & Throughout the GTA.

Contact Brian Crothers

Crothers Criminal Law defends DUI & impaired driving charges.

  • Client charged with FLIGHT FROM POLICE, FAIL TO STOP and DANGEROUS OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE. Defence proceeds to trial to attack identification of client. Just prior to trial crown attorney agrees to WITHDRAW ALL CHARGES and client resolves to careless driving under the Highway Traffic Act. Brampton, Ontario Court of Justice.
  • Client charged with IMPAIRED OPERATION BY DRUG. Defence able to obtain expert evidence that questioned the police ‘drug recognition’ evidence measuring alleged impairment. Crown agreed to WITHDRAW the charge and client resolved to careless driving under the Highway Traffic Act. Milton, Ontario Court of Justice.
  • Client charged with IMPAIRED OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE, and OPERATE MOTOR VEHICLE BAC OVER 80. After lengthy negotiations advancing flaws in the police investigation, crown attorney agrees to WITHDRAW BOTH CHARGES. Client resolves to careless driving under the Highway Traffic Act. Bracebridge, Ontario Court of Justice.
  • Client charged with IMPAIRED OPERATION & REFUSE BREATH SAMPLE. Defence filed motion alleging violation of client’s rights against unlawful detention and unreasonable search and seizure. At trial judge granted defence motion. BOTH CHARGES DISMISSED. Brampton Provincial Court.
  • Client charged with REFUSE ROADSIDE BREATH SAMPLE. Defence filed motion alleging violation of client’s rights to counsel. At trial judge granted defence motion. CHARGE DISMISSED. Brampton Provincial Court.
  • Client charged with OVER 80, and defence able to have charge WITHDRAWN after examination of breathalyzer machine revealed flaws in Crown’s case. Brampton Provincial Court.
  • Client’s charge of OPERATE MOTOR VEHICLE WITH BLOOD ALCOHOL LEVEL OVER 80 was dismissed after trial. Despite readings of nearly 2 times the legal limit, defence was able to assert that the breathalyzer evidence was unreliable after lengthy cross-examination of police witness. Brampton Provincial Court.
  • Client acquitted of REFUSE TO PROVIDE BREATH SAMPLE due to defence ability to show breath machine was unreliable. Toronto Provincial Court.
  • IMPAIRED DRIVING charge stayed after defence motion granted due to unreasonable delay of trial. Toronto Provincial Court.
  • Client acquitted of REFUSE TO PROVIDE BREATH SAMPLE after defence able to establish at trail police did not have reasonable grounds to legally request breath sample. Guelph Provincial Court.
  • OVER 80 charge dismissed after defence established police did not collect sample in proper manner. Brampton Provincial Court.
  • IMPAIRED DRIVING charge withdrawn after defence motion to exclude illegally obtained police evidence. Brampton Provincial Court.
  • Client found not guilty of REFUSE BREATH SAMPLE charge after trial after defence able to present evidence to establish accused did not intend to refuse police. Newmarket Provincial Court
  • IMPAIRED DRIVING/OVER 80 charges acquitted after trial. Police alleged client blew twice the legal limit. Barrie Provincial Court.
  • Client acquitted of charges of IMPAIRED OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE and OVER 80 at trial after successful defence application granted whereby client’s rights to counsel were violated. Scarborough Provincial Court.
  • Charges of IMPAIRED OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE and REFUSE BREATH SAMPLE were dismissed at trial after cross examination of police involved revealed significant flaws in their investigation of the case. Toronto Provincial Court.
  • Client was charged with two counts of DANGEROUS DRIVING CAUSING DEATH. Defence obtained expert report evidence of accident reconstruction. After lengthy negotiations with the crown, both charges of DANGEROUS DRIVING CAUSING DEATH were withdrawn. Brampton Provincial Court of Justice.
  • Client charged with FAIL TO REPORT ACCIDENT and FAIL TO REMAIN AT THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT. At trial defence successfully excluded client’s statement to the police. Client found not guilt of all charges. Brampton Provincial Court.
Request Consultation